Website growth audit

Find the website decisions that need evidence before they need fixes.

Simpleweb can review an agreed website scope across buyer journeys, technical SEO, performance, accessibility, content structure, and measurement. The audit records observed findings and priorities; remediation is a separate scope that begins only after the findings, access, risks, and implementation ownership are approved.

Service priorities

Review the website as a connected decision path, not a collection of isolated scores.

Automated checks can reveal useful signals, but page intent, content clarity, consent, lead flow, implementation condition, and business priorities require documented human review.
Buyer path

Review clarity and conversion-path friction

Inspect agreed pages, navigation, offers, proof, calls to action, forms, and handoff states without claiming that an observed change will increase conversion.

Technical state

Record crawl, performance, accessibility, and release observations

Use approved tools and reproducible checks to inspect rendered output, metadata, canonicals, redirects, internal links, structured data, assets, responsive behavior, and selected accessibility and performance signals.

Measurement

Check whether available data can support the next decision

Review approved analytics, search, consent, and enquiry evidence with its date range and known gaps. Missing or inaccessible data is reported as a limitation, not estimated.

Working scope

A findings package whose depth follows the approved scope and available access.

The custom proposal fixes the audit boundary, sample size, tools, evidence format, review rounds, reporting date, and exclusions. Implementation, content production, platform changes, penetration testing, legal review, and ongoing monitoring are not included unless separately scoped.

Website Growth Audit deliverables

06
  • Scope, access, and evidence register

    The approved URLs, environments, devices, tools, accounts, data sources, test dates, owners, access restrictions, and known blind spots.

  • Buyer-path observation map

    Page-purpose, message, proof, navigation, CTA, form, status, and handoff observations for the agreed journeys, without an uplift forecast.

  • Technical SEO and link findings

    Observed crawl, indexation, metadata, canonical, redirect, sitemap, structured-data, and internal-link conditions within the approved sample.

  • Performance and accessibility observations

    Tool- and environment-specific findings for selected templates and viewports, with test conditions and no certification claim.

  • Measurement and consent inventory

    Approved analytics, search, enquiry, consent, and reporting signals, plus prohibited data, access gaps, attribution limits, and decisions needing qualified review.

  • Prioritized findings and ownership record

    Evidence, impact rationale, confidence, dependencies, suggested owner, and next decision for each accepted finding. A fix estimate or remediation release is prepared separately.

Delivery process

Move from a fixed test boundary to evidence, priorities, and an implementation decision.

Each stage records the source, date, environment, limitations, and responsible owner so a later remediation proposal does not silently expand the audit.
  1. Boundary

    Confirm the business questions, page and template sample, environments, devices, tools, data, access method, prohibited actions, review rounds, and reporting date.

    Output: Approved audit brief
  2. Observe

    Run the agreed automated and manual checks, preserve reproducible evidence, and record inaccessible systems or inconclusive signals without filling gaps with assumptions.

    Output: Evidence register
  3. Prioritize

    Group findings by buyer impact, technical risk, evidence strength, dependency, effort uncertainty, and responsible owner rather than by tool score alone.

    Output: Prioritized findings
  4. Decide

    Review factual corrections and one consolidated clarification round, then separate accepted findings into internal work, qualified review, monitoring, or a new remediation proposal.

    Output: Decision and handoff note

Service questions

Set the audit, access, reporting, and remediation boundaries before work begins.

Next step

Define the evidence boundary before requesting a website audit.

Share the current website, priority buyer journeys, known issues, platform context, available search or analytics access, and the decision the audit must support. The proposal will state the sample, tools, deliverables, limits, review round, and the separation between findings and remediation.